Whose lies?

The following represents my opinion regarding Caleb Hannan's role in the death of Dr V.

One of my close relatives runs a small business. She constantly complains of how some of her larger competitors resort to dishonest means to attract clients, yet no journalist has ever made it his or her business to investigate these practices. This is because they happen all the time. 

In fact you can dig into all sorts of products to find untruths, lies and false claims. Everything from cigarette manufacturers claiming they improved fitness and didn’t cause cancer to thorough misdescriptions of hotels and holiday resorts, perhaps omitting to mention the building site next door or the flightpath over the beach. Occasionally journalists pick up on something like this and, occasionally lies and untruths make it into the media.  But only occasionally.

So when Caleb Hannan produces an article in which he outs a transwoman who has reportedly failed to provide him with evidence that she was telling the truth about her qualifications and past experience when selling a new type of golf club, then he is talking about something that happens regularly, systemically and persistently. 

I know food supplement companies who claim endorsements from doctors, yet we are not told how much those doctors were paid for those endorsements, or indeed whether they would have endorsed those products if they were not paid. Have you ever wondered how someone working out in the fields all day was supposed to eat a Ploughman’s Lunch? Well the truth is that it is highly likely that no ploughman has ever eaten a Ploughman’s Lunch, at least when he was working in the fields, and today he would be unable to afford a quality piece of Cheddar on sumptuous wholemeal bread since the government introduced poverty wages for agricultural workers. It is a marketing ploy, a con invented in the 1960s by which time ploughmen had been replaced by tractor drivers. Apple’s white, open, clean, forward-thinking, hypercool presentation of its philosophy and its products does not sit well with the filthy, oppressive, slave-labour conditions, accusations of bullying, high rate of suicide and poverty wages at its assembly plant in China.

If we were to search for whiter-than-white business purity, to find a business that does not stretch the truth, which does not use less than honest means to push its products in competitive markets then we would have to look very hard indeed. I have been lied to, not just by estate agents, as you might expect, but by salesmen and women of different companies, solicitors, tradesmen, potential employers, IT maintenance services, laser hair removal providers, rail companies and airlines.

When I say ‘lied’ I mean usually that there were things that I needed to know that they were not telling me, and that, unless I asked the exact right question I would not have been told. 

For example:

Q: “How long is the lease?”

A: “It’s around 80 years.”

Q: “How long exactly?”

A: “Erm, let me get back to you…”

… a week later…

Q: “You were going to provide me with exact details of the length of the lease…?”

A: “erm…yes… It’s...errr... 79 years and 8 months.”

Anyone who knows anything about residential properties in the UK and lease extensions will know that there is a huge difference in the cost of renewing a lease (and thus the resale value) on a property with 80 years and one day left on the lease and one with 79 years and 364 days left, (thanks to Cadogan v Sportelli if you must know).

So dishonesty and concealment of the truth are therefore regular players in the commercial world. When Dr V was selling her new golf club Caleb Hannan suggests that some of her claims about her own past were not true, something that Jane Fae has written about here; pointing out that Hannan has not actually verified his claims, particularly in terms of absence of evidence.

What we do know about the product she was selling however is that it was a good product, it worked. It is something that would most likely have sold itself once a few people in the golf world had got their hands on it and won games, improved their handicaps etc. However Dr V needed to get her product out there and used by enough people for this to happen before one of the larger sports equipment makers copied it and drove her out of business. Yes we have patent laws to prevent this from happening but unless you have almost unlimited access to expensive lawyers you won’t stand a chance of enforcing a patent when you are up against a large multinational company. So she had to move fast if she wanted to capitalize on her invention.

Her product is clearly revolutionary and will change the way golf is played, so what is the difference between telling people its inventor went to this or that university and suggesting to people munching overpriced open sandwiches that they are eating something which is traditional and has probably been around for centuries? Especially when you have promised to focus on the product not the producer. In the end the product is good, in spite of the amateur marketing.

Personally I am inclined not to believe Hannan’s claims about Dr V's lies for the simple reason that he has form in being less than thorough and straightforward in his own journalist career. Not only that but he refused point-blank to negotiate the opportunity to go and verify Dr V’s credentials from her previous life, something that could potentially have resulted in his scoop being less sensationalist. And if he had seen evidence that Dr V’s qualifications, which he doubted were true, that would suggest that some of the other things she claimed were also true. In other words his story would have fallen apart like a house of cards. Was this his motivation behind his refusal to explore this further...?

This didn’t appear to matter to Hannan however and consequently he will forever be tainted with questions about DrV’s death, especially since, as I suspect will happen in due course, evidence comes to light about her past which tells a different story to that of Hannan.

One of the things Hannan has clearly failed to research however is the way trans people live. In some parts of the US, like New York or San Francisco it may be possible to live openly as a trans person. However there are many parts of America, and indeed plenty of other countries too, where being openly trans is a death sentence, or at least a route to social and economic marginalisation. So what he tells us is her ‘dishonesty’ about her gender (and which I would describe as ‘honesty’ about her gender; her real gender is female, if she were to present as anything else she would be lying) is in fact a means of protecting herself both physically and emotionally.

Being trans is hard, cisgenderism in our culture means that the world is not set up to accommodate trans people and as a result we suffer from exclusion, delegitimisation and violence. People, especially in the media, seem to consider us legitimate targets for outing when the story has nothing to do with our genders.  Yet Hannan went ahead with outing Dr V when he clearly didn’t know anything about trans people, how we lead our lives, how precarious those lives can be and how dangerous the world can be for trans people.

How do we know this? Well the most telling part of his entire article we this;

“Finally it hit me. Cliché or not, a chill actually ran up my spine.

“Are you trying to tell me that Essay Anne Vanderbilt was once a man?””

In particular what Hannan describes as a “chill” going up his spine suggests the possibility of a number of things;

• 1.     He knows little or nothing about trans people
• 2.     He considers trans people to be inherently evil
• 3.     He considers trans people to be inherently problematic
• 4.     He considers that being trans is a form of deception. This is reinforced by his subsequent misgendering of Dr V.
• 5.     He is transphobic.
• 6.     He lacks empathy for other human beings

What is most striking about Hannan is how, despite deciding out her as trans, he clearly had no idea about what it means to out a trans person. What would the implications have been for her personally? How would that have affected things like her job, her accommodation and her personal safety and security, the people in her neighbourhood? It is also clear from the story that being trans had nothing to do with its substance other than making it difficult for her to substantiate her claims to her qualifications and experience.

Yet Hannan includes her gender identity in his story in the full knowledge that Dr V’s gender is irrelevant to the substance of the case. In my opinion he does this in order to make it more sensational and more likely to sell. In other words Dr V's life was collateral damage in Caleb Hannan's career, he considered that her life did not matter, especially when presented with the opportunity for a sensationalist and prurient story. Trans people are of little consequence, we are less than human. 

Hannan also joins the lowest of the low when he deliberately misgenders her in the article. This is the oldest trick in the book and an opportunity to make your journalism appear 'edgy' and 'transgressive'. Except it is neither, misgendering is a low level moronic move which any idiot can do it. It is about as edgy and transgressive as neoliberalism and as intelligent as George W Bush.

Had he done a little research he would have discovered that many trans people were routinely advised to cover their past, to invent a backstory, move to another city and start a new life. This used to be standard practice for psychologists in gender clinics and many trans people still do it today. Being in “deep stealth” is a means of survival in a world which is hostile to trans people. I know a young trans woman who lives this way despite transitioning only a few months ago. Of course once you tell one lie, others inevitably have to follow, but these are not deliberate, intentional, malicious lies however, they are lies borne of necessity, forced on us by others in society who are intolerant of trans people. Other people's lies by proxy.

Yet Hannan appears to have done no research and made the decision to out Dr V without considering the consequences for her. This is, in my opinion, unforgivable, especially since it was something that was irrelevant to substance of the story. I suspect that this is the most likely explanation of what happened, and the most generous. Because the other is that he did do some research, was aware of the possible consequences for her but did it anyway, which is even more unforgivable. instead he has done nothing more than rehash the tired old 'trans-as-deception' lie.

And let us be honest here, Grantland is also less than pure whiter-than-white over this story. It did not have to publish, or it could have published without outing Dr V. One suspects that the temptation of go for clickbait and associated advertising revenue was the motivation behind it, in my opinion this is thoroughly reprehensible. 

So let's recap. A person who has a less than pure, whiter-than-white past, working for a blog that appears to have less than scrupulous morals about clickbait, has savaged someone else for appearing, also to be less than a pure, whiter-than-white geeky inventor, and exposed part of her life which was irrelevant to this, to sensationalise her and prop up an otherwise non-story. 

Trans people's lives are complicated, business is complicated, journalists constantly set up straw men of uncontaminated, whiter-than-white, purity as the norm in our society, when it is abundantly clear that this is not the case, they then act like outraged saints knocking it down. Except in this case, as with so many "journalists" they are far from uncontaminated by skeletons in their own closets.

No-one comes out of this with clean hands, but the filthy, exploitative and selfish actions of the editor of Grantland and Caleb Hannan, make Dr V appear almost angelic.

Trans children in Denmark

This is my translation of a recent FB post by the mother of a trans child in Denmark, heartbreaking...

“My 6 year old daughter goes to a school where there are at present swimming lessons here in the nursery class .

Which of course should be a good thing , however, we have learned that the swimming pool has informed the school that my daughter can not attend with her girlfriends. Because she has gender identity disorder, she is biologically a boy but lives like and identifies as a girl.

It would be incredibly demeaning to have to change with the boys and it would probably also be a breeding ground for bullying.

Basically I do not understand the requirement that one should follow one's biological sex changing rooms but if that is the requirement , there should also be an option for those for whom using these changing rooms it is not possible.

I simply can not understand that it is not possible to provide a changing facility for her, like a disabled changing room.

All I see is unnecessary discrimination of a little girl who does not understand why she cannot go to swimming with her friends.”

As we can see the problems for trans children are largely caused by adults and their ignorance. It is likely that these problems for her are caused indirectly by the attitudes or percieved attitudes of the parents of other children. I have met this little girl and her mother, and she is just a normal little child who loves everything little girls love. She was wearing a princesses outfit and enjoying the warmth of her mother's hugs and there was absolutely nothing masculine or boyish about her. It is heartbreakig to see this happen and we need to ensure that the attitudes of bigoted and narrow-minded adults stop harming other people's children.

TERFism in crisis.

“TERF” is the acronym for transphobes who hide behind bogus feminist discourse to harass and abuse trans people, previously referred to “Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists.” However it has now become apparent that neither the “Exclusionary” nor the “Radical Feminist” parts of this descriptor are accurate. There seems to be a new consensus forming around “Trans Erasing Reactionary Fakefeminists” as a more appropriate reading. Of course this new descriptor has the advantage that it still uses the acronym “TERF” but that is entirely intentional.

Back in the dark days of TERFism, in the 1970s and 80s when TERFs were unopposed by trans people in such large numbers and their declared aim was to see us “morally mandated out of existence” they were quite clear that their main aim was erasure or extermination. Despite the huge numbers of deaths caused by TERF collaboration with the Republican Party to deny trans people in the US access to healthcare, this was not a very effective strategy. It is estimated that the number of openly trans people and stealth trans people in existence has increased by at least 10,000% since Janice Raymond wrote the TERF bible “The Transsexual Empire.”
 

Even before trans people had become organised to counter their lies and fight back at their policy of placing trans people into situations where they face violence and murder, the failure of TERF policy was manifest. To the horror of the TERFs trans people simply refused to be mandated out of existence. What the TERFs failed to realise was that trans people had nowhere else to go. We could either be ourselves or die one way or another. 

TERFism was in a mess, it had failed and now trans people were starting to become organised via the internet and were opposing TERF ideology wherever we could. Their stream of ever more ridiculous unsupported assertions were being revealed for the lies, half-truths and fabrications that they were. The publication of Sandy Stone’s paper, “The Empire Strikes Back.” effectively discredited Raymond’s core assertion, revealing it as a fantasy fabrication. The discrediting of Raymond through simple arguing back unnerved the TERFs and panic set in producing the subsequent TERF declaration that healthcare for trans people should be made into a human rights violation, something which set off the current dribble of ever more ridiculous statements about trans people. First-dribble TERFism was over, second-dribble TERFism had begun.

However second-dribble TERFism started to suffer, to an even greater extent than first-dribble TERFism, from trans people pointing out the glaring inconsistencies in their “arguments”. TERF ideology, having been forced by the enfeeblement of first-dribble TERFism, to become ever more extreme and ever more farfetched, layed it open to critique by trans people and their allies in a way that can only be described as beyond ridicule. TERFs reeled from humiliation after humiliation heaped on their “arguments” by ordinary trans people on blogs, forums, Twitter and Facebook and even in mainstream media. Having had mainstream media to themselves this was too much to deal with. TERFs became the laughing stock, their credibility, already at a low level, evaporated.

The problem for TERFs is that they suffer from a defective ideology. We all create theories of how the world works and test those theories out against reality periodically. In most cases those theories are altered or replaced by a process of creative thought characterised, by psychologists, as “constructive alternativism.” The problem for TERFs was that they had invested so much, as a group, in TERFism that they could not break out of this ideology and could not risk losing their own self-individualities and social identities that would come with admitting what they all realise deep down is reality; that they are wrong and that their entire belief-system cannot deal with the simple, plain, clear criticism of it put forward by trans people and their allies.

This left them only one alternative, and it is the one we see today; to use their superior socio-economic position to try and silence trans people and prevent trans people from repeating their observations about TERFism which undermine their own sense of selfhood as TERFs and expose them to acute humiliation.  The only problem with this is that, since their own ideology cannot stand up to even the most elementary criticism, they have to rely on the standard method of TERFism; to provoke trans people into a reaction and then turn around to everyone else and say, “look we told you trans people are [insert whatever allegation here]”. So they had to both provoke and silence at the same time. Difficult but possible, hence the introduction of multiple legal threats to silence trans people and allies. These, along with threats to employers, are becoming standard practice now for TERFs. The problem is that provocation is becoming ever harder since trans people are much wiser now, and to be honest most of us ignore TERFs most of the time, there is simply no point in engaging in any discourse with them.

Hence the outing of the trans girl in Colorado by the TERF community. A child who has been threatened with violence and murder by the TERFs' friends on the Tea Party far right. The child in question is now on suicide watch. A sickening, revolting and contemptible act of bullying and cowardice by any standards – except obviously by those of the TERFs. The problem is that such evil acts are the only way TERFs are going to get any kind of attention from any sensible trans people. So this sort of thing is not going to go away. The provocation/silencing method will need to continue or TERFs will simply be unable to exist discursively, their worldview completely shattered.  This is the equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears and singing loudly in the hope that you don’t hear what people around you are saying while kicking anyone nearby who is smaller than you.

Desperate measures of course, but TERFism is now in a struggle for existence, it cannot continue in the current discursive climate where pretty much any trans person can discredit TERF discourse. There will be no third-dribble TERFism this time it is the TERFs who have nowhere to go. This time the very existence of TERFism is under threat. No ideology can ever exist in a world where it is repeatedly discursively undermined and ridiculed by large numbers of people. As the TERFs diminish to an ever more isolated rump of extremists the only other possibility they have is to pretend to be Radical Feminists and gain access an unsuspecting audience before they have had time to hear the alternative point of view.

In effect TERFism is on course towards ever more vicious and violent acts of cowardice and hatred and lies, they will need to use ever more harmful means to provoke trans people. This will not end until their violence by proxy is exposed. In the meantime it is likely that trans people will be harmed as a direct result of TERF action.

TERF silencing/harassment

As we have seen in recent months trans people who criticise or expose TERF actions are generally subjected to online harrassment by the TERF community. After being left alone by TERFs for a long time (a very good thing IMO), after publishing a blog post criticising TERFs for deleting their own material on the internet and then telling everyone that trans people are "silencing" them, I suddenly get a tweet from a TERF organisation linking to an abusive and defamatory page about me.

Other trans campaigners, such as Dana have had worse, including TERFs contacting their employers. The TERF community is now exhibiting how profoundy hyprcritical it is. The only reason for this harassment is to threaten us into silence, in the same way some TERFs have been threatening some of us into silence by sending solicitors' letters to trans people who criticise them.

It seems that whilst being "trans-critical" (the TERF euphemism for 'transphobia' or 'trans-hatred') is OK, exposing the activities of the TERF community is not. They simply cannot tolerate us exposing their "arguments", activities, obsessive hatred and unintelligent belligerance. They say they want to "debate" about trans people, yet there has never been any debate on their side, only aggressive harassment and abuse.

What a pathetic group of people.

No Debate. TERFs: Hating, Harming and Harassing Trans People.

TERFs have harmed and harassed trans people for more than 40 years. Their actions demonstrate that they are not interested, as they would have everyone else believe, in 'legitimate debate' about trans people...

The 1980s' TERF – Republican alliance against trans people continues...

The battle to withdraw California’s AB 1266 ordinance, which allows trans kids to use the bathroom appropriate to their gender, has been joined by the TERFs. The TERF community has decisively taken the side of the Tea Party, right-wing “Christian” organisations and anti-gay and lesbian groups like the Pacific Justice Institute to try and prevent trans children in California’s schools from using the bathroom facilities appropriate to their gender.

Make no mistake the consequences for California’s young trans people if this ordinance were to be withdrawn would be catastrophic and deadly. Children would be forced to use inappropriate bathrooms, children would be beaten up at school and most trans children would probably start school refusing in large numbers. Every trans child would be outed every day and constantly spotlighted as different. Effectively denied access to education, most young trans people would be left with no alternative but to exist on society’s margins rather than have careers and jobs like everyone else. Many would inevitably end up in sex work and in jail (the wrong jail at that), these people would effectively be placed in situations where they are vulnerable to assault and murder, which is inherent in sex work, especially if you are trans. If this protection is withdrawn young trans people will die.

The TERF community appears to have thrown its weight behind promoting a completely inaccurate, unsubstantiated, and entirely fabricated report of a Trans child supposedly "assaulting" girls in bathrooms in a school in Colorado. The Pacific Justice Institute has admitted that this storywas a lie but employed the classic TERF argument that a trans girl entering the girls’ bathroom constituted violence against girls per se. There has clearly been contact between TERFs and the PJI on this issue as the PJI are resorting to the old TERF canard that “trans people harm women simply by their existence.”

The involvement of the TERF community at the highest level in this miserable and sordid mendacity draws on an alliance between TERFs and the Republicans which was established in the 1980s, when they colluded with the Right-wing Republican administration to have healthcare provision for trans people made unavailable. A direct result of this was that trans people, and especially ethnic minority trans people, were forced into sex work, not only to fund their own medical treatment but to keep body and soul together.

Until now TERFs across the board have denied this, although they almost certainly realise that government papers released to historians and archivists will, at some point in the future, reveal hard evidence of this connivance. Yet despite TERFs being the only group campaigning against trans people in the 1980s they have repeatedly, if unconvincingly, tried to deny links with the Republicans and right-wing groups. Today their denials will be viewed as no more than cowardice.

Yet now the main consequence of the TERF collaboration with Republicans and anti-LGBT right-wing “religious” groups and their deliberate lies is that documentary evidence of the TERF-Republican alliance against trans people in the 1980s is no longer required. By their actions today they have demonstrated that this alliance, to target one of the most vulnerable and powerless groups in American society, is very much alive. They have effectively confirmed their ongoing association with Republicans to harm trans people established 30 years ago and that this behind-the-scenes collaboration is continuing apace.

Doubtless the TERF community will deny this. Of course TERF desperation to avoid taking responsibility for their own actions in inflicting violence and murder by proxy on the trans community is understandable if pathetic. However the consequences of this alliance in terms of their own credibility are even more devastating. The Tea Party, the Republicans in general, right-wing “Christian” groups, and assorted extremist bigot groups of the right-wing fringe are not merely anti-gay and anti-lesbian, they are anti-feminist. They oppose women’s right to choose on abortion and a whole host of other measures that effectively amount to state control over women’s bodies.

Actions speak Louder than words

What these TERF actions say about them is volumes more than the totality of misleading, mendacious and malicious words uttered by them. By siding with the enemies of women, the enemies of feminism and the enemies of lesbian, gay and bisexual people they have shown that they can no longer be regarded as feminists. Just as many trans people, and other feminists, have long suspected their "feminism" is nothing more than a cover for obsessive hatred. These people are not and have never been feminists. Feminists do not work with the Republican Tea Party; the enemies of everything feminism stands for.

Their determination to harm and bully trans children by proxy, to fight for discriminatory legislation with the deliberate intention of placing young trans people in California in positions where they are particularly vulnerable to violence and murder demonstrates the depth of their hatred. Make no mistake this is TERF violence against trans people pure and simple. The fact that they are prepared to inflict this violence by proxy onto some of the youngest and most vulnerable trans people reveals more about the REAL intentions of the TERF community. The controller of the pilotless drone in his bunker in Nevada is still responsible for the death and destruction caused; just because the TERF community has decided to campaign to place trans people in situations where they are vulnerable to violence does not make them any less guilty of the resulting violence, just more cowardly.

In recent months a number of ”TERF writers have protested that trans people have been 'silencing' legitimate TERF debate about trans people.The actions of the TERF community in this affair have demonstrated that this is not the case. The TERFs are not at all interested in legitimate “debate” about trans people, nor have they ever been. They are only interested in hating, harassing and harming trans people, usually by proxy. The sordid affair of these TERF/extreme-right-wing lies about this trans child has exposed, not merely their ongoing collaboration with the enemies of feminism and LGB equality but the untruth in the assertions of these TERF writers that TERFs just want legitimate debate. They have clearly demonstrated by their actions that they are not interested in debate, they are interested only in harming trans people.

Postscript on "TERF".

The only remaining issue for trans people to consider is what to do with the descriptor “TERF”. ‘Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist’ was originally designed as a factual descriptor (although TERFs would have us believe that it was intended as a deliberate insult, but they would wouldn’t they?). My suggestion is that we keep the acronym “TERF” but alter the meaning slightly, because these people are clearly not “feminists” and there is nothing “radical” about hatred, but replace the “Radical” with “Right-wing” and “Feminist” with “Fanatic”; “Trans Exclusionary Right-wing Fanatics” still gives us the TERF acronym and is a much more accurate descriptor of this group of haters.